[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":183},["ShallowReactive",2],{"guide:why-not-found-does-not-mean-not-accessible":3},{"slug":4,"title":5,"description":8,"keywords":11,"updatedAt":14,"summary":15,"sections":24,"relatedPages":132},"why-not-found-does-not-mean-not-accessible",{"zh-Hant-TW":6,"en":7},"收集公開無障礙訊號時，為什麼「有沒有找到」不等於「有沒有做」？","Why “Not Found” Does Not Mean “Not Accessible” When Collecting Public Accessibility Signals",{"zh-Hant-TW":9,"en":10},"公開無障礙訊號能提供線索，但找不到聲明、認證或維護訊號，不代表網站沒有做無障礙；找到了，也不代表整個網站都沒有問題。","Public accessibility signals provide clues, but not finding a statement, certification, or maintenance signal does not mean a site has done nothing. Finding one also does not mean the whole site has no barriers.",{"zh-Hant-TW":12,"en":13},"公開無障礙訊號, 無障礙聲明找不到, 無障礙認證範圍, 網站無障礙資料限制, accessibility signal","public accessibility signals, accessibility statement not found, accessibility certification scope, accessibility data limitations, website accessibility signals","2026-07-03",{"zh-Hant-TW":16,"en":20},[17,18,19],"Accesserty 收集的是公開可追溯訊號，不是網站好壞排名，也不是完整無障礙判定。","聲明可能集中在母公司頁面、子網域或 path 可能有不同範圍，footer 找不到也不代表網站沒有聲明。","認證、聲明、ALLY、使用者回報與機器掃描摘要都只是線索；Signal 的設計是顯示線索，而不是替網站下最後結論。",[21,22,23],"Accesserty collects public, traceable signals. It is not a website ranking system or a complete accessibility judgment.","Statements may live on a parent-company page, subdomains or paths may have different scopes, and not finding a footer link does not mean no statement exists.","Certifications, statements, ALLY, user reports, and machine scan summaries are all clues. Signal is designed to show clues, not make final judgments about websites.",[25,36,60,82,95,108],{"title":26,"body":29},{"zh-Hant-TW":27,"en":28},"公開訊號是線索，不是判決","Public signals are clues, not verdicts",{"zh-Hant-TW":30,"en":33},[31,32],"Accesserty 收集的資料包含無障礙認證、無障礙聲明、ALLY、使用者回報與部分機器掃描摘要。這些資料有一個共同點：它們都能被追溯到某個公開來源、經審核的維護者或具體使用情境。","但公開訊號不是完整無障礙判斷。它們不能取代人工檢測、輔助科技測試、使用者研究或法規要求判斷。比較準確的說法是：它們能讓人更快知道「哪裡有值得確認的線索」。",[34,35],"Accesserty collects accessibility certifications, accessibility statements, ALLY records, user reports, and some machine scan summaries. These records share one property: they can be traced to a public source, a reviewed maintainer, or a concrete usage context.","But public signals are not a complete accessibility judgment. They do not replace manual review, assistive technology testing, user research, or legal conformance decisions. A more accurate description is that they help people find clues worth checking.",{"title":37,"body":40,"items":45},{"zh-Hant-TW":38,"en":39},"為什麼「沒找到」不等於「沒有做」？","Why “not found” does not mean “nothing exists”",{"zh-Hant-TW":41,"en":43},[42],"公開資料收集一定有邊界。即使網站有做無障礙，也可能沒有把訊號放在容易被使用者或程式找到的位置。",[44],"Public data collection always has boundaries. Even when a site has accessibility work in place, the signal may not be placed somewhere users or software can easily find.",{"zh-Hant-TW":46,"en":53},[47,48,49,50,51,52],"無障礙聲明可能集中在母公司、集團或主要品牌頁面，而不是每個產品網域各自發布。","有些網站把聲明放在頁腳，有些放在支援中心、法律頁、隱私權頁或獨立表單服務。","footer 找不到，不代表沒有；sitemap 沒列出，也不代表頁面不存在。","子網域可能屬於同一個服務，也可能是完全不同的產品或外部系統。","同一個 domain 底下的 path 通常較可能屬於同一網站，但大型平台、政府入口或多租戶服務仍可能例外。","robots 設定、JavaScript 渲染、地區導向、登入牆與網站重構，都可能影響資料是否被找到。",[54,55,56,57,58,59],"An accessibility statement may live on a parent-company, group, or main brand page instead of each product domain.","Some sites place statements in the footer; others place them in help centers, legal pages, privacy pages, or external form services.","Not finding a footer link does not mean there is no statement. Not finding it in a sitemap does not mean it does not exist.","A subdomain may belong to the same service, or it may represent a different product or external system.","A path under the same domain is often more likely to belong to the same site, but large platforms, government portals, and multi-tenant services can still be exceptions.","Robots settings, JavaScript rendering, regional redirects, login walls, and site redesigns can all affect discovery.",{"title":61,"body":64,"items":69},{"zh-Hant-TW":62,"en":63},"為什麼「找到了」也不等於「整站沒有問題」？","Why “found” does not mean “the whole site has no barriers”",{"zh-Hant-TW":65,"en":67},[66],"找得到公開訊號是一件好事，因為它代表使用者至少有線索可以追蹤。但這個線索仍然需要被正確解讀。",[68],"Finding a public signal is useful because it gives people something traceable. But that signal still needs to be interpreted carefully.",{"zh-Hant-TW":70,"en":76},[71,72,73,74,75],"認證可能只涵蓋特定頁面、特定服務、特定版本或特定時間點。","無障礙聲明通常是網站方的公開說明，不一定是第三方檢測結果。","ALLY 表示網站維護者願意維護回報管道與處理節奏，不代表網站沒有問題。","使用者回報反映一個具體情境，不應直接推論整個網站都不可用。","機器掃描摘要只能看到部分可自動化偵測的問題，不能判斷完整流程是否可用。",[77,78,79,80,81],"A certification may cover specific pages, services, versions, or points in time.","An accessibility statement is usually a public explanation from the site owner, not necessarily a third-party test result.","ALLY means a maintainer is willing to maintain reporting and response practices. It does not mean the site has no issues.","A user report reflects a concrete context. It should not be used to conclude that the entire site is unusable.","A machine scan summary only sees some machine-detectable issues. It cannot decide whether the full flow is usable.",{"title":83,"body":86},{"zh-Hant-TW":84,"en":85},"domain、subdomain 與 path 的範圍問題","Domain, subdomain, and path scope",{"zh-Hant-TW":87,"en":91},[88,89,90],"網站範圍不是永遠能從網址直接判斷。這也是 Accesserty 必須保守處理資料顯示的原因。","Signal 不會自動把母網域的聲明套用到所有子網域，因為子網域可能是不同產品、不同系統、不同團隊，甚至是第三方服務。對同一個 domain 底下的 path，Signal 會比較容易視為同一網站範圍，但仍會提醒 coverage may vary by page or service。","換句話說，Signal 顯示的是「這個網域或路徑附近有可追溯訊號」，不是宣稱該訊號一定涵蓋每一個頁面、每一個流程或每一個子服務。",[92,93,94],"Website scope cannot always be determined from a URL alone. That is why Accesserty handles display rules conservatively.","Signal does not automatically apply a parent-domain statement to every subdomain, because a subdomain may represent a different product, system, team, or third-party service. For paths under the same domain, Signal is more willing to treat them as the same site area, but it still warns that coverage may vary by page or service.","In other words, Signal shows that a traceable signal exists near this domain or path. It does not claim that the signal covers every page, flow, or sub-service.",{"title":96,"body":99},{"zh-Hant-TW":97,"en":98},"Signal 為什麼不做網站好壞排名？","Why Signal does not rank websites as good or bad",{"zh-Hant-TW":100,"en":104},[101,102,103],"把網站排成好壞看起來簡單，但很容易製造錯誤結論。無障礙不是一個單一分數，也不是只有標章、聲明或掃描結果可以代表。","對使用者來說，更有用的是知道：這個網站是否有公開聲明？是否有可追溯的公開紀錄？是否有人願意接收回報？是否曾經出現具體使用阻礙？這些資訊可以幫助人做下一步判斷，但不應被包裝成網站排名。","Accesserty Signal 的設計目標，是把線索放到更容易看見的位置，讓使用者與網站維護者都能更快找到下一步，而不是用不完整資料替網站貼標籤。",[105,106,107],"Ranking websites as good or bad looks simple, but it can create false conclusions. Accessibility is not a single score, and it cannot be represented only by a badge, statement, or scan result.","For users, the more useful questions are: does this site publish a statement? Is there a traceable public record? Is someone willing to receive reports? Have concrete barriers been reported? These details can support the next decision, but they should not become a ranking.","Accesserty Signal is designed to place clues where they are easier to notice so users and maintainers can find the next step. It is not designed to label websites with incomplete data.",{"title":109,"body":112,"items":117},{"zh-Hant-TW":110,"en":111},"Accesserty 的資料原則","Accesserty’s data principles",{"zh-Hant-TW":113,"en":115},[114],"這些限制不是缺點，而是資料使用時必須說清楚的邊界。Accesserty 會用以下原則維持資料可信度。",[116],"These limits are not a weakness; they are boundaries that need to be stated clearly. Accesserty uses the following principles to keep the data trustworthy.",{"zh-Hant-TW":118,"en":125},[119,120,121,122,123,124],"只呈現可追溯來源、經審核的維護者或具體回報線索。","不推測網站沒有公開的內部流程或真實維護狀態。","不把「找不到」解讀為「沒有做」。","不把「找到了」解讀為「完整合格」。","不把公開訊號轉成網站好壞排名。","資料有疑慮時，寧可保守顯示、加上範圍提醒，或暫時不顯示。",[126,127,128,129,130,131],"Show only traceable sources, reviewed maintainers, or concrete report clues.","Do not infer internal processes or actual maintenance status that the site has not made public.","Do not treat “not found” as “nothing was done.”","Do not treat “found” as “fully conformant.”","Do not convert public signals into good\u002Fbad website rankings.","When data is uncertain, display conservatively, add scope notes, or do not display it yet.",[133,141,148,153,161,168,173,178],{"label":134,"path":137,"description":138},{"zh-Hant-TW":135,"en":136},"Accesserty 如何理解無障礙訊號","How Accesserty understands accessibility signals","\u002Fpublic-data",{"zh-Hant-TW":139,"en":140},"了解公開標章、聲明、ALLY、回報與機器掃描摘要的差異與限制。","Understand the differences and limits of public badges, statements, ALLY, reports, and machine scan summaries.",{"label":142,"path":144,"description":145},{"zh-Hant-TW":143,"en":143},"Accesserty Signal","\u002Fsignal",{"zh-Hant-TW":146,"en":147},"在搜尋結果中顯示公開無障礙訊號，並讓使用者回報遇到的阻礙。","Show public accessibility signals in search results and let users report barriers.",{"label":149,"path":152},{"zh-Hant-TW":150,"en":151},"無障礙聲明術語頁","Accessibility statement glossary page","\u002Fglossary\u002Faccessibility-statement",{"label":154,"path":157,"description":158},{"zh-Hant-TW":155,"en":156},"無障礙認證、認可、標章與獎項資料來源","Accessibility certification, recognition, badge, and award sources","\u002Fpublic-data\u002Fcertifications",{"zh-Hant-TW":159,"en":160},"查看 Accesserty 目前支援的公開認證、認可、獎項、標章與資料來源限制。","Review the public certification, recognition, award, and badge sources currently supported by Accesserty.",{"label":162,"path":164,"description":165},{"zh-Hant-TW":163,"en":163},"Accesserty ALLY","\u002Fally",{"zh-Hant-TW":166,"en":167},"了解 ALLY 如何作為網站積極維護無障礙體驗的公開訊號。","Learn how ALLY works as a public signal of active accessibility maintenance.",{"label":169,"path":172},{"zh-Hant-TW":170,"en":171},"網站公開無障礙訊號指南","Public accessibility signals guide","\u002Fguides\u002Fpublic-accessibility-signals",{"label":174,"path":177},{"zh-Hant-TW":175,"en":176},"如何閱讀無障礙聲明","How to read an accessibility statement","\u002Fguides\u002Fhow-to-read-accessibility-statements",{"label":179,"path":182},{"zh-Hant-TW":180,"en":181},"網站無障礙認證與標章","Web accessibility certification and badges","\u002Fguides\u002Fwhy-accessibility-certification-is-not-a-whole-site-guarantee",1789828081445]