[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":142},["ShallowReactive",2],{"guide:public-accessibility-signals":3},{"slug":4,"title":5,"description":8,"keywords":11,"updatedAt":14,"summary":15,"sections":24,"relatedPages":91},"public-accessibility-signals",{"zh-Hant-TW":6,"en":7},"網站公開的無障礙訊號，能告訴我們什麼？","What Public Accessibility Signals Can Tell Us",{"zh-Hant-TW":9,"en":10},"標章、無障礙聲明、ALLY、使用者回報與機器掃描摘要都是公開或可追溯的無障礙訊號。它們能幫助使用者和網站維護者看見線索，但不能被當成完整符合證明。","Badges, accessibility statements, ALLY, user reports, and machine scan summaries are public or traceable accessibility signals. They can make clues easier to notice, but they are not full compliance guarantees.",{"zh-Hant-TW":12,"en":13},"無障礙訊號, 無障礙聲明, 無障礙標章, 網站無障礙公開資料, accessibility signals, accessibility statement","public accessibility signals, accessibility statement, accessibility certification, web accessibility badge, public accessibility data","2026-06-30",{"zh-Hant-TW":16,"en":20},[17,18,19],"法規與制度很重要，但一般使用者在搜尋或開啟網站前，通常看不到制度本身。","使用者比較可能看見的是網站留下的公開訊號：標章、聲明、維護狀態、回報管道與掃描線索。","Accesserty Signal 的目標不是替網站排名，而是讓這些分散的訊號在需要判斷時更容易被看見。",[21,22,23],"Laws and systems matter, but people usually cannot see those systems before opening a website.","What people can notice are public signals left by websites: badges, statements, maintenance status, report channels, and scan clues.","Accesserty Signal is not a ranking system. It makes scattered signals easier to notice when people need context.",[25,36,58,69,80],{"title":26,"body":29},{"zh-Hant-TW":27,"en":28},"制度存在，但使用者看見的是訊號","Systems exist, but people see signals",{"zh-Hant-TW":30,"en":33},[31,32],"不同地區用不同方式推動數位無障礙。有些地方重視官方標章，有些地方要求公開無障礙聲明，有些地方以監測、申訴與市場監督為主。","但對正在搜尋網站、準備使用服務、或遇到操作困難的人來說，完整制度通常太遠。真正能在當下提供線索的，是網站是否留下可追溯的公開訊號。",[34,35],"Different regions promote digital accessibility in different ways. Some emphasize official badges, some require public accessibility statements, and others rely on monitoring, complaints, and market supervision.","For someone searching for a site, preparing to use a service, or encountering a barrier, the full system is often too far away. What can help in the moment is whether the website leaves traceable public signals.",{"title":37,"body":40,"items":45},{"zh-Hant-TW":38,"en":39},"公開無障礙訊號包含什麼？","What counts as a public accessibility signal?",{"zh-Hant-TW":41,"en":43},[42],"Accesserty 會把不同強度的資料分開理解。它們不是同一件事，也不應該被混成單一分數。",[44],"Accesserty separates signals with different strengths. They are not the same thing and should not be collapsed into a single score.",{"zh-Hant-TW":46,"en":52},[47,48,49,50,51],"無障礙認證、認可、獎項或標章紀錄：通常較可追溯，但範圍可能只涵蓋部分頁面、部分服務或某個時間點。","無障礙聲明：代表網站公開說明標準、限制、改善方向或回報管道，但多數情況不是第三方認證。","Accesserty ALLY：代表持有有效 Pulse claim 的維護者通過審核，正在維護回報管道與處理節奏，但不是符合證明。","使用者回報：反映真實使用情境中的阻礙，能補足機器掃描看不到的問題。","機器掃描摘要：能指出可被自動化偵測的風險，但不能取代人工檢測或輔助科技測試。",[53,54,55,56,57],"Accessibility certification, recognition, award, or badge records: usually more traceable, but scope may cover selected pages, services, or one point in time.","Accessibility statements: public explanations of standards, limits, improvement plans, or feedback channels, but usually not third-party certification.","Accesserty ALLY: a reviewed signal that a maintainer with an active Pulse claim is maintaining reporting and response practices, not a compliance guarantee.","User reports: real-use clues that can reveal barriers machine checks do not see.","Machine scan summaries: useful for automated risks, but not a replacement for manual review or assistive technology testing.",{"title":59,"body":62},{"zh-Hant-TW":60,"en":61},"目前資料看到的型態","Patterns visible in the current data",{"zh-Hant-TW":63,"en":66},[64,65],"Accesserty 目前整理的資料還不適合拿來做全球排名，但已足以看見不同制度留下的不同痕跡。義大利資料偏向官方無障礙聲明；英國公部門的 accessibility statement 較制度化；美國民生服務網站多是自行發布聲明；台灣、韓國、印度、香港、澳洲等來源則更容易看到標章、認證、認可或獎項資料。","這些觀察不能推論哪個地區或哪個網站「比較無障礙」。它們比較適合說明：無障礙努力如果要被看見，需要留下清楚、可追溯、可理解的公開訊號。",[67,68],"Accesserty’s current data is not suitable for global rankings, but it already shows how different systems leave different traces. Italy leans toward official accessibility declarations. UK public-sector statements are more systematized. US everyday-service sites often publish their own statements. Sources in Taiwan, Korea, India, and others more often expose badge or certification data.","These observations should not be used to infer which region or website is “more accessible.” They are better used to explain that accessibility work becomes more visible when it leaves clear, traceable, and understandable public signals.",{"title":70,"body":73},{"zh-Hant-TW":71,"en":72},"Signal 為什麼顯示這些資料？","Why Signal shows this data",{"zh-Hant-TW":74,"en":77},[75,76],"Accesserty Signal 不重新排序搜尋結果，也不替網站下最後判斷。它只把原本分散在官方列表、網站聲明、維護名單與回報流程裡的訊號，放到使用者比較容易看見的位置。","這對一般使用者的價值是：在開啟網站前多一點脈絡。對網站維護者的價值是：如果網站已經做出公開承諾、取得標章或願意處理回報，這些努力不應該藏在難找的頁腳或外部列表裡。",[78,79],"Accesserty Signal does not reorder search results or make final judgments about websites. It places signals that are otherwise scattered across official lists, website statements, maintenance records, and reporting flows where people are more likely to notice them.","For users, the value is more context before opening a site. For maintainers, the value is that public commitments, badges, or report handling should not remain hidden in a hard-to-find footer or external list.",{"title":81,"body":84},{"zh-Hant-TW":82,"en":83},"給網站維護者的提醒","A note for site maintainers",{"zh-Hant-TW":85,"en":88},[86,87],"如果你的網站有無障礙聲明，請讓它容易找到、內容具體、回報管道清楚。如果網站有標章或認證，請保留原始來源與範圍說明。如果你願意接收並處理使用者回報，可以登錄網域、安裝靜態 Pulse script，再從 Console 驗證首頁安裝並建立有效 claim，讓目前的 claim 維護者查看與該次 claim 關聯的回報。","公開訊號不是終點。它只是讓無障礙從檢測報告或內部文件，往使用者可理解、可追溯、可回報的方向前進。",[89,90],"If your website has an accessibility statement, make it easy to find, specific, and clear about feedback channels. If the site has a badge or certification, keep the original source and scope understandable. If you are willing to receive and handle user reports, register the domain, install the static Pulse script, and verify the homepage installation in Console. The resulting claim holder can review new reports attached to that claim.","Public signals are not the endpoint. They move accessibility from audit reports or internal documents toward something users can understand, trace, and report against.",[92,100,107,114,122,127,132,137],{"label":93,"path":96,"description":97},{"zh-Hant-TW":94,"en":95},"Accesserty 如何理解無障礙訊號","How Accesserty understands accessibility signals","\u002Fpublic-data",{"zh-Hant-TW":98,"en":99},"了解公開標章、聲明、ALLY、回報與機器掃描摘要的差異與限制。","Understand the differences and limits of public badges, statements, ALLY, reports, and machine scan summaries.",{"label":101,"path":103,"description":104},{"zh-Hant-TW":102,"en":102},"Accesserty Signal","\u002Fsignal",{"zh-Hant-TW":105,"en":106},"在搜尋結果中顯示公開無障礙訊號，並讓使用者回報遇到的阻礙。","Show public accessibility signals in search results and let users report barriers.",{"label":108,"path":110,"description":111},{"zh-Hant-TW":109,"en":109},"Accesserty ALLY","\u002Fally",{"zh-Hant-TW":112,"en":113},"了解 ALLY 如何作為網站積極維護無障礙體驗的公開訊號。","Learn how ALLY works as a public signal of active accessibility maintenance.",{"label":115,"path":118,"description":119},{"zh-Hant-TW":116,"en":117},"無障礙認證、認可、標章與獎項資料來源","Accessibility certification, recognition, badge, and award sources","\u002Fpublic-data\u002Fcertifications",{"zh-Hant-TW":120,"en":121},"查看 Accesserty 目前支援的公開認證、認可、獎項、標章與資料來源限制。","Review the public certification, recognition, award, and badge sources currently supported by Accesserty.",{"label":123,"path":126},{"zh-Hant-TW":124,"en":125},"無障礙聲明術語頁","Accessibility statement glossary page","\u002Fglossary\u002Faccessibility-statement",{"label":128,"path":131},{"zh-Hant-TW":129,"en":130},"無障礙覆蓋工具術語頁","Accessibility overlay glossary page","\u002Fglossary\u002Faccessibility-overlay",{"label":133,"path":136},{"zh-Hant-TW":134,"en":135},"如何閱讀無障礙聲明","How to read an accessibility statement","\u002Fguides\u002Fhow-to-read-accessibility-statements",{"label":138,"path":141},{"zh-Hant-TW":139,"en":140},"上線後無障礙監測指南","Post-launch accessibility monitoring guide","\u002Fguides\u002Fpost-launch-accessibility-monitoring",1789828080971]