[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":116},["ShallowReactive",2],{"guide:how-to-read-accessibility-statements":3},{"slug":4,"title":5,"description":8,"keywords":11,"updatedAt":14,"summary":15,"sections":24,"relatedPages":80},"how-to-read-accessibility-statements",{"zh-Hant-TW":6,"en":7},"如何閱讀無障礙聲明？","How to Read an Accessibility Statement",{"zh-Hant-TW":9,"en":10},"無障礙聲明不是認證，但它能告訴使用者網站如何描述標準、已知限制、回報管道與改善方式。這份指南說明哪些資訊值得看、哪些承諾需要保留判斷。","An accessibility statement is not certification, but it can show how a website describes standards, known limits, feedback channels, and improvement work. This guide explains what to look for and where to be cautious.",{"zh-Hant-TW":12,"en":13},"如何閱讀無障礙聲明, 無障礙聲明, accessibility statement, 無障礙聲明範本, 網站無障礙聲明","how to read an accessibility statement, accessibility statement, website accessibility statement, accessibility statement template","2026-06-30",{"zh-Hant-TW":16,"en":20},[17,18,19],"無障礙聲明的價值在於公開說明與回報入口，不是替網站蓋章。","好的聲明通常會說明適用標準、目前狀態、已知限制、回報方式與更新日期。","如果聲明只寫「我們重視無障礙」而沒有具體資訊，就只能當作很弱的訊號。",[21,22,23],"The value of an accessibility statement is public explanation and a feedback path, not a stamp of approval.","A useful statement usually explains standards, current status, known limits, feedback methods, and update date.","If a statement only says the organization values accessibility without specifics, it remains a weak signal.",[25,36,58,69],{"title":26,"body":29},{"zh-Hant-TW":27,"en":28},"先確認它是不是聲明，而不只是口號","First check whether it is a statement, not only a slogan",{"zh-Hant-TW":30,"en":33},[31,32],"有些頁面只寫「我們致力於無障礙」，但沒有說明標準、限制、回報方式或更新日期。這樣的文字可以代表網站有意識到議題，但不能提供足夠線索。","比較有用的無障礙聲明，會讓使用者知道網站目前宣稱依循什麼標準、哪些部分還有問題、遇到阻礙時可以去哪裡回報。",[34,35],"Some pages only say “we are committed to accessibility” without standards, limits, feedback methods, or update dates. That can show awareness, but it does not provide enough usable context.","A more useful accessibility statement tells users what standard the site refers to, what may still be limited, and where people can report barriers.",{"title":37,"body":40,"items":45},{"zh-Hant-TW":38,"en":39},"值得看的五個資訊","Five details worth checking",{"zh-Hant-TW":41,"en":43},[42],"閱讀聲明時，不需要把它當法律文件逐字解析。先看它是否提供使用者真的用得到的資訊。",[44],"You do not need to read a statement like a legal document. Start by checking whether it gives users information they can actually use.",{"zh-Hant-TW":46,"en":52},[47,48,49,50,51],"適用標準：是否提到 WCAG、EN 301 549、所在地法規或其他明確依據。","適用範圍：是否說明涵蓋整站、部分服務、App、PDF 或特定頁面。","已知限制：是否誠實列出目前未完成或需要協助的部分。","回報管道：是否有清楚的聯絡方式、表單或處理流程。","更新日期：是否能看出聲明是近期維護，而不是多年未更新。",[53,54,55,56,57],"Standard: whether it mentions WCAG, EN 301 549, local regulations, or another clear reference.","Scope: whether it covers the whole site, selected services, apps, PDFs, or specific pages.","Known limits: whether it honestly lists unfinished or problematic areas.","Feedback channel: whether there is a clear contact method, form, or process.","Update date: whether the statement appears maintained rather than forgotten.",{"title":59,"body":62},{"zh-Hant-TW":60,"en":61},"哪些說法需要保留判斷？","Where to stay cautious",{"zh-Hant-TW":63,"en":66},[64,65],"如果聲明宣稱「完全符合」或「100% 無障礙」，但沒有說明檢測方式、範圍與限制，反而需要保留判斷。無障礙狀態會隨內容、功能、第三方元件與網站更新而改變。","有些聲明主要來自 overlay 或外掛服務提供者，內容可能偏向描述工具能力，而不是網站本身如何修復問題。這類聲明不一定沒有價值，但不能直接視為完整改善證據。",[67,68],"If a statement claims “fully compliant” or “100% accessible” without test methods, scope, or limits, treat it carefully. Accessibility changes as content, features, third-party components, and the site itself change.","Some statements are mainly provided by overlay or widget vendors. They may describe the tool more than how the website itself was fixed. That does not make them useless, but they should not be treated as complete remediation evidence.",{"title":70,"body":73},{"zh-Hant-TW":71,"en":72},"對使用者與維護者各有什麼用？","How users and maintainers can use it",{"zh-Hant-TW":74,"en":77},[75,76],"對使用者來說，聲明最重要的是讓人知道網站是否提供回報入口，以及遇到問題時可以聯絡誰。對維護者來說，聲明是一種公開承諾：不需要假裝完美，但應該清楚說明如何持續改善。","Accesserty Signal 會把已知無障礙聲明作為較弱但仍有價值的公開訊號。它不能證明網站無障礙，但能讓使用者更快找到說明與回報入口。",[78,79],"For users, the most important value is knowing whether there is a feedback path and who to contact when a barrier appears. For maintainers, a statement is a public commitment: it does not need to pretend perfection, but it should explain ongoing improvement.","Accesserty Signal treats known accessibility statements as weaker but still useful public signals. They do not prove accessibility, but they can help people find explanations and feedback channels faster.",[81,89,94,101,106,111],{"label":82,"path":85,"description":86},{"zh-Hant-TW":83,"en":84},"Accesserty 如何理解無障礙訊號","How Accesserty understands accessibility signals","\u002Fpublic-data",{"zh-Hant-TW":87,"en":88},"了解公開標章、聲明、ALLY、回報與機器掃描摘要的差異與限制。","Understand the differences and limits of public badges, statements, ALLY, reports, and machine scan summaries.",{"label":90,"path":93},{"zh-Hant-TW":91,"en":92},"無障礙聲明術語頁","Accessibility statement glossary page","\u002Fglossary\u002Faccessibility-statement",{"label":95,"path":97,"description":98},{"zh-Hant-TW":96,"en":96},"Accesserty Signal","\u002Fsignal",{"zh-Hant-TW":99,"en":100},"在搜尋結果中顯示公開無障礙訊號，並讓使用者回報遇到的阻礙。","Show public accessibility signals in search results and let users report barriers.",{"label":102,"path":105},{"zh-Hant-TW":103,"en":104},"無障礙聲明範例：發布前應確認什麼","Accessibility statement example: what to include before publishing","\u002Fguides\u002Faccessibility-statement-example-before-you-publish",{"label":107,"path":110},{"zh-Hant-TW":108,"en":109},"網站公開無障礙訊號指南","Public accessibility signals guide","\u002Fguides\u002Fpublic-accessibility-signals",{"label":112,"path":115},{"zh-Hant-TW":113,"en":114},"W3C WAI 無障礙聲明產生器","W3C WAI accessibility statement generator","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.w3.org\u002FWAI\u002Fplanning\u002Fstatements\u002Fgenerator\u002F",1789828087755]